Ahem.Henrik wrote:I can imagine that some of you have rather strong opinions, so please be nice! If this turns out to a verbal fight, I will delete the thread.
The thread seems to have gotten just a teensy-weensy bit off topic.
Ahem.Henrik wrote:I can imagine that some of you have rather strong opinions, so please be nice! If this turns out to a verbal fight, I will delete the thread.
Bruno, it's on the list, down at #98. The song didn't really become a phenomenon until early this year, so its 2013 ranking will seem low.Bruno wrote:What about "Happy" by Pharrel Williams?
If I'm reading Otisredding's post correctly, that #8 would be the album's rank for last year. The news is even better for 2014, if you look at the current list - it looks like Beyonce would be #6 right now.irreduciblekoan wrote:Thank you! Good to know that she would be solidly in the top 10.
Yes, when we did a 1950s and 1960s poll. In 2010. It's a bit late to revise those results, though. We should be cycling back to the '60s soon enough. What fun that'll be.Bruce wrote:That makes sense, but have we voted on 1969 yet?
But the U.S. version, identical in content but titled The Rod Stewart Album, was actually released first, in November 1969.Bruce wrote:You have this album in 1969 but it should be in 1970.
https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album ... _you_down/
That's OK. Thanks!Henrik wrote:Harold, sorry I didn't get back to you right away. Thanks a lot, although I had actually added all those data myself already.Harold wrote:Henrik, I sent you something a few days ago that I'd been working on independently which related to this. Did you receive it?
With Beck and Wild Beasts coming next week as well, the next update will be very interesting indeed.Mattceinicram wrote:Man, with the sort of response the new St. Vincent record is getting, it might jump straight to number one on the next list.